Latest Blog Posts

Focus on 2012: 5 key areas in Enterprise IT

(19 December 2011)

From in-house to consultancy: moving to the ‘dark side’

(01 December 2011)

Brace for the feared double dip: IT planning can maximise mergers and acquisitions

(27 October 2011)

The tricky business of justifying IT expenditure

(19 October 2011)

IT consultants should drop the ITIL clichés to win clients over

(19 October 2011)

Steps to a successful Service Transition – new white paper by Plan-Net

(26 September 2011)

‘Cloud Consultancy’ – Experience On Demand

(26 September 2011)

ITIL 2011: Continual Service Improvement or just the result of V3 being rushed?

(03 August 2011)

The GLOCAL IT Service Desk

(26 June 2011)

Oh no… Not another Service Management initiative!

(20 June 2011)

5 reasons to employ an IT consultant

(22 May 2011)

Financial firms’ IP is safe with VDI

(11 May 2011)

IT Support: grow-your-own or buy organic?

(11 May 2011)

Where is that ‘cultural change’ which makes ITSM Best Practice effective?

(19 April 2011)

Executive exceptions: Best Practice killers or just business as usual?

(10 April 2011)

Desktop Virtualisation: Still not a perfect View

(23 March 2011)

What is the impact of the Cloud on the existing IT environment?

(10 March 2011)

Private vs. public sector IT security: more dedicated staff, yet less awareness

(03 March 2011)

Surviving IT spending cuts in the public sector

(15 February 2011)

10 things we learnt in 2010 that can help make 2011 better

(23 December 2010)

IT workforce continuity

(17 December 2010)

Minimising IT downtime for finance professionals

(30 November 2010)

ITIL V3 – should you bother?

(24 November 2010)

Taking the third option

(25 October 2010)

The peculiarities of Metro Bank’s IT outsourcing model

(19 October 2010)

Saving ITIL – how to protect the reputation of Best Practice frameworks

(11 October 2010)

5 tips for moving Disaster Recovery to the Cloud

(04 October 2010)

Does the future of business mobile computing lie in hybrid tablet devices?

(27 September 2010)

How many police officers does it take to email 10,000 criminal records to a journalist by accident?

(15 September 2010)

The perils of commoditising IT Support

(01 September 2010)

Life after ITIL – creating a culture of Continual Service Improvement

(02 August 2010)

10 reasons to migrate to Exchange 2010

(27 July 2010)

Are you Off-Sure about your IT Service Desk?

(14 July 2010)

Mind the skill gap

(11 July 2010)

Microsoft should fear not – is Apple even in the same league?

(24 June 2010)

Is your IT Service Desk future proof?

(22 June 2010)

The quest for a portable office - are all mobile devices safe for work?

(21 June 2010)

Will Tablets rule the future?

(16 June 2010)

Getting back to work - but with a service provider.

(15 June 2010)

Cloud computing: how to minimise lock-in risks

(09 June 2010)

Public sector, private data - is outsourcing the Service Desk too risky?

(02 June 2010)

Doing more with less: an opportunity to learn

(06 May 2010)

Sharing the IT Service Desk: sharing cost, sharing quality

(03 May 2010)

So, Microsoft outsources IT support – What’s all the fuss about?

(27 April 2010)

Survey reveals 1/3 of UK organisations put off Windows 7 roll-out, but are they wise to wait?

(13 April 2010)

Is information safe enough at NHS trusts?

(31 March 2010)

Best Practice and Virtualisation: essential tools in Business Resilience and Continuity planning

(25 March 2010)

What to look for when bringing offshore work back home

(22 March 2010)

5 thoughts on the IT Service Desk that need re-thinking

(10 March 2010)

Microsoft System Center Service Manager 2010: a credible challenger in the Service Management software market?

(17 February 2010)

Do you really want to lose (inter)face?

(15 February 2010)

A new lease of IT life

(11 February 2010)

From ITIL v2 to v3 – where to start?

(08 February 2010)

Can you afford not to invest in Best Practice?

(02 February 2010)

Experiential Learning explained through Confucius

(02 February 2010)

Quick win, quick fall if you fail to plan ahead

(11 January 2010)

Cloud computing – Help your IT out of the Tetris effect

(08 January 2010)

One of you may be fired

(17 December 2009)

Hot or not. ..Says who?

(15 December 2009)

2012: avoiding the IT Apocalypse

(03 December 2009)

Punishment alone does not work

(03 August 2009)

HSBC Data Loss

(26 July 2009)

ITIL for ITILs sake

(02 June 2009)

VDI and Windows 7

(06 May 2009)

The art of deception

(05 May 2009)

VDI - the revolution begins...

(04 May 2009)

Wake up and tackle the real VDI issues!

(24 March 2009)

ITIL Version 3

(18 February 2009)

Virtualisation - making the headlines

(18 February 2009)

Batten down the Hatches!

(18 February 2009)

Overcome the Freeze

(10 January 2007)

10 reasons to migrate to Exchange 2010

Posted in Infrastructure on 27 July 2010 by

A Plan-Net survey found that 87% of organisations are currently using Exchange 2003 or earlier. There has been a reluctance to adopt the 2007 version, often considered to be the ‘Vista' of the server platform - faulty and dispensable. But an upgrade to a modern, improved version is now becoming crucial: standard support for the 2003 version ended over a year ago and much technological progress has been made since then. It seems that unconvinced organisations need some good reasons to move from their well-known but obsolete system to the new and improved 2010 version, where business continuity and resilience are easier to obtain and virtualisation can be embraced, with all the benefits that follow.

Here are 10 reasons your organisation should migrate to Exchange 2010:

1- Continuous replication

International research shows that companies lose £10,000/$10,000 an hour to email downtime. This version of Exchange enables continuous replication of data which can minimise disruptions dramatically and spare organisations from such loss. Moreover, Microsoft reckons the costs of deploying Exchange 2010 can be recouped within six months thanks to the improvements in business continuity and

2- Allows Virtualisation

It supports virtualisation, allowing consolidation. Server virtualisation is not only a cost cutter, reducing expenditure related to maintenance, support staff, power, cooling and space. It also improves business continuity - when a virtual machine is down, computers can run on another virtual machine with no downtime.

3- Cost savings on storage

Exchange 2010 has, according to Microsoft, 70% less disk I/O (input/output) than Exchange 2007. For this reason, the firm recommends moving away from SAN storage solutions and adopt less expensive direct attached storage. This translates to real and significant cost savings for most businesses.

4- Larger mailboxes

Coupling the ability to now use larger, slower SATA (or SAS) disks with changes to the underlying mailbox database architecture allows for far larger mailbox sizes than previously to become the norm.

5- Voicemail transcription

Unified Messaging, first introduced with Exchange 2007, offers the concept of the ‘universal inbox' where email and voice mail are available from a single location and consequently accessed from any of the following clients:

* Outlook 2007 and later
* Outlook Web App
* Outlook Voice Access - access from any phone
* Windows Mobile 6.5 or later devices

A new feature to Exchange 2010, Voicemail Preview, sees text-transcripts of voicemails being received, saving the time it takes to listen to the message. Upon reception of a voice message, the receiver can glance at the preview and decide whether it is an urgent matter. This and other improvements, such as managing voice and email from a single directory (using AD), offer organisations the opportunity to discard third-party voicemail solutions in favour of Exchange 2010.

6- Helpdesk cost reduction

Exchange 2010 offers potential to reduce helpdesk costs by enabling users to perform common tasks which would normally require a helpdesk call. Role-based Access control (RBAC) allows delegation based on job function which, coupled with the Web-based Exchange Control Panel (ECP), enables users to assume responsibility for Distribution Lists, update personal information held in AD and track messages. This reduces the call volumes placed on the Helpdesk, with obvious financial benefits.

7- High(er) Availability

Exchange 2010 builds upon the continuous replication technologies first introduced in Exchange 2007. The technology is far simpler to deploy than Exchange 2007 as the complexities of a cluster install are taken away from the administrator. It incorporates easily with existing Mailbox servers and offers protection at the database - with Database Availability Groups - rather than the server level. By supporting automatic failover, this feature allows faster recovery times than previously.

8- Native archiving

A large hole in previous Exchange offerings was the lack of a native managed archive solution. This saw either the proliferation of un-managed PSTs or the expense of deploying third-party solutions. With the advent of Exchange 2010 - and in particular the upcoming arrival of SP1 this year - a basic archiving suite is now available out-of-the-box.

9- Can be run on-premise or in the cloud

Exchange 2010 offers organisations the option to run Exchange ‘on-premise' or in the ‘cloud'. This approach even allows organisations to run some mailboxes in the cloud and some on locally held Exchange resources. This offers companies very competitive rates for mailbox provision from cloud providers for key mailboxes, whilst deciding how much control to relinquish by still hosting most mailboxes on local servers.

10- Easier calendar sharing

With Federation for Exchange 2010, employees can share calendars and distribution lists with external recipients more easily. The application allows them in fact to schedule meetings with partners and customers as if they belonged to the same organisation. Whilst this might not appeal to most organisations, those investing in collaboration technologies will see the value Exchange 2010 offers.

Taking the leap

Due to the uncertain economy many organisations are wary of investing their tight budgets in projects deemed unessential. However, if they follow the ‘more with less' rule and invest in some good service management for their IT Service Desk, the resulting cost savings will free resources that can be invested in this type of asset. The adoption of Exchange 2010, in turn, will allow more efficient use of IT by end users and help the service desk run more smoothly, thus engaging in a cycle of reciprocal benefits.

 

Keith Smith, Senior Consultant

This article is featured on Tech Republic: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=1681&tag=leftCol;post-1681

 

Post your Comments

(required)

(required, never displayed)