Latest Blog Posts

Focus on 2012: 5 key areas in Enterprise IT

(19 December 2011)

From in-house to consultancy: moving to the ‘dark side’

(01 December 2011)

Brace for the feared double dip: IT planning can maximise mergers and acquisitions

(27 October 2011)

The tricky business of justifying IT expenditure

(19 October 2011)

IT consultants should drop the ITIL clichés to win clients over

(19 October 2011)

Steps to a successful Service Transition – new white paper by Plan-Net

(26 September 2011)

‘Cloud Consultancy’ – Experience On Demand

(26 September 2011)

ITIL 2011: Continual Service Improvement or just the result of V3 being rushed?

(03 August 2011)

The GLOCAL IT Service Desk

(26 June 2011)

Oh no… Not another Service Management initiative!

(20 June 2011)

5 reasons to employ an IT consultant

(22 May 2011)

Financial firms’ IP is safe with VDI

(11 May 2011)

IT Support: grow-your-own or buy organic?

(11 May 2011)

Where is that ‘cultural change’ which makes ITSM Best Practice effective?

(19 April 2011)

Executive exceptions: Best Practice killers or just business as usual?

(10 April 2011)

Desktop Virtualisation: Still not a perfect View

(23 March 2011)

What is the impact of the Cloud on the existing IT environment?

(10 March 2011)

Private vs. public sector IT security: more dedicated staff, yet less awareness

(03 March 2011)

Surviving IT spending cuts in the public sector

(15 February 2011)

10 things we learnt in 2010 that can help make 2011 better

(23 December 2010)

IT workforce continuity

(17 December 2010)

Minimising IT downtime for finance professionals

(30 November 2010)

ITIL V3 – should you bother?

(24 November 2010)

Taking the third option

(25 October 2010)

The peculiarities of Metro Bank’s IT outsourcing model

(19 October 2010)

Saving ITIL – how to protect the reputation of Best Practice frameworks

(11 October 2010)

5 tips for moving Disaster Recovery to the Cloud

(04 October 2010)

Does the future of business mobile computing lie in hybrid tablet devices?

(27 September 2010)

How many police officers does it take to email 10,000 criminal records to a journalist by accident?

(15 September 2010)

The perils of commoditising IT Support

(01 September 2010)

Life after ITIL – creating a culture of Continual Service Improvement

(02 August 2010)

10 reasons to migrate to Exchange 2010

(27 July 2010)

Are you Off-Sure about your IT Service Desk?

(14 July 2010)

Mind the skill gap

(11 July 2010)

Microsoft should fear not – is Apple even in the same league?

(24 June 2010)

Is your IT Service Desk future proof?

(22 June 2010)

The quest for a portable office - are all mobile devices safe for work?

(21 June 2010)

Will Tablets rule the future?

(16 June 2010)

Getting back to work - but with a service provider.

(15 June 2010)

Cloud computing: how to minimise lock-in risks

(09 June 2010)

Public sector, private data - is outsourcing the Service Desk too risky?

(02 June 2010)

Doing more with less: an opportunity to learn

(06 May 2010)

Sharing the IT Service Desk: sharing cost, sharing quality

(03 May 2010)

So, Microsoft outsources IT support – What’s all the fuss about?

(27 April 2010)

Survey reveals 1/3 of UK organisations put off Windows 7 roll-out, but are they wise to wait?

(13 April 2010)

Is information safe enough at NHS trusts?

(31 March 2010)

Best Practice and Virtualisation: essential tools in Business Resilience and Continuity planning

(25 March 2010)

What to look for when bringing offshore work back home

(22 March 2010)

5 thoughts on the IT Service Desk that need re-thinking

(10 March 2010)

Microsoft System Center Service Manager 2010: a credible challenger in the Service Management software market?

(17 February 2010)

Do you really want to lose (inter)face?

(15 February 2010)

A new lease of IT life

(11 February 2010)

From ITIL v2 to v3 – where to start?

(08 February 2010)

Can you afford not to invest in Best Practice?

(02 February 2010)

Experiential Learning explained through Confucius

(02 February 2010)

Quick win, quick fall if you fail to plan ahead

(11 January 2010)

Cloud computing – Help your IT out of the Tetris effect

(08 January 2010)

One of you may be fired

(17 December 2009)

Hot or not. ..Says who?

(15 December 2009)

2012: avoiding the IT Apocalypse

(03 December 2009)

Punishment alone does not work

(03 August 2009)

HSBC Data Loss

(26 July 2009)

ITIL for ITILs sake

(02 June 2009)

VDI and Windows 7

(06 May 2009)

The art of deception

(05 May 2009)

VDI - the revolution begins...

(04 May 2009)

Wake up and tackle the real VDI issues!

(24 March 2009)

ITIL Version 3

(18 February 2009)

Virtualisation - making the headlines

(18 February 2009)

Batten down the Hatches!

(18 February 2009)

Overcome the Freeze

(10 January 2007)

Cloud computing: how to minimise lock-in risks

Posted in Infrastructure on 09 June 2010 by

Choosing more than one supplier is necessary until a time when cloud computing comes of age.

Virtualising servers, purchasing space in data centres and utilising applications hosted and managed by third parties can have some undeniable advantages: they can increase efficiency, decrease IT-related costs, allow greater mobility and also represent a greener alternative for organisations. But as the popularity of cloud computing grows, so do concerns regarding the unclear implications of the new technologies. If the initial worries were mostly about security of data stored at a provider, now an even bigger question is arising: what would happen if an organisation wanted their data back to bring it in-house as they grow, or to transfer it to another provider as part of a merger, or a cheaper and more efficient provider for some of the services (e.g. only email or back-up)? Although it is possible to retrieve and migrate data, it is not an easy and straightforward operation and the costs involved might represent a barrier, causing the organisation to be locked-in with the provider - and accept any price and conditions they might decide to impose.

The problem with the newness of cloud computing technologies is that there are yet to be set standards for data formats and APIs to allow interoperability between infrastructures. Cloud computing providers are already working on how to improve portability and reduce latency during data transfers, but only within services and platforms hosted on their own, proprietary infrastructure. Migration to another vendor can instead be a lengthy and expensive procedure - apart from possible end-of-contract penalties, organisations will be charged both for format conversion and for the transfer, including additional charges for bandwidth usage which due to the high latency, might altogether amount to a very large figure. Migration costs can be prohibitive when dealing with a large amount of data, therefore even if it might seem easier and convenient to have only one vendor providing all services, storing the entire organisation's data within one infrastructure represents a threat which might obstruct growth, structural changes and the search for more cost-efficient and bespoke solutions.

Experts reckon it might be a few years before data and service portability within vendors will be possible, but organisations need not put off a move to the cloud - they just have to apply some smart thinking. The key to avoiding lock-in, it seems, is to not have all the eggs in one basket. The wisest organisations are already using this technique, which sees them cherry-picking various vendors for different services: one provider for email, another for back-up and another couple for applications and VDI. There are a few criteria for choosing, not necessarily based on the cheapest offers: ideal vendors have to first of all provide modular packages, use popular formats for data and services and be transparent on regulations and fees applied to data transfer.

Many benefits can be achieved with this strategy: for instance, organisations can create a bespoke and flexible solution, and choose the best offer for each service. In some cases the overall price could be higher than the cost of a single provider for all services, but if it is lengthy and economically prohibitive to switch vendor, then price is inelastic and can be increased at any time, leaving the organisation no choice but to pay. It is also essential to take into account the risk of a provider going bust: the recent security attacks on Google and the dotcom meltdown have taught us that no company is too big to go out of business.

To avoid data and financial loss, the only solution is to use more than one vendor. It is only through a game of pick and choose that lock-in risks and their consequences can be avoided, while still enjoying the cost-efficiencies made possible by cloud computing.

Ayodele Soleye, Senior Consultant

This article is featured on Director of Finance Online: http://www.dofonline.co.uk/content/view/4645/152/

Post your Comments

(required)

(required, never displayed)